January 17, 2013

posted Jan 30, 2013, 12:19 PM by Jai   [ updated Apr 4, 2014, 12:23 PM ]


Paul Guthrie from Indiana has filed a $50 million lawsuit against the United States and various defendants, alleging that Barrack Obama is not eligible to be President, but instead occupies the Office of President essentially as a Monarch.

The foundation of Mr. Guthrie's suit starts with the fact that there are two jurisdictions in the U.S. Constitution:  (1) the original and pre-eminent natural law jurisdiction represented by male and female citizens known as “We the People”, and (2) the positive law jurisdiction represented by the three branches of government created: the Legislative, Executive and Judicial.

Given these opposite and opposed jurisdictions, i.e., one based on natural law and the other on positive law, there are two corresponding types of U.S. citizens:  (1) a U.S. citizen who inherits his or her rights of citizenship by natural law, called a natural born Citizen, and (2) a U.S. citizen who gains his or her citizenship by positive man-made law, called a naturalized citizen.

A natural born U.S. Citizen inherits his or her citizenship only from a U.S. State citizen father.  A naturalized citizen gains his or her citizenship by positive law grant from the government.  The only other difference between these two types of citizens is that, by design, only a natural born Citizen of the United States may become a U.S. President.

Because natural born citizenship is naturally inherited from one’s father, Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen of Kenya.  Because he did not have a U.S. State citizen father, he is not a natural born Citizen of the United States.  Instead, Mr. Obama is actually a naturalized U.S. citizen, one who gained citizenship through positive law recognition of his U.S. citizen mother and/or his birth on U.S. soil, both of these avenues being statutorily-created privileges that are permitted to grant naturalization at birth.  As a natural born citizen of Kenya, Mr. Obama is not eligible to be the U.S. President.

The distinction between natural born Citizens and naturalized citizens was built into the U.S. Constitution to prevent the establishment of a monarchy in this country.  By tying the Office of President to natural law, the Founding Fathers devised a brilliant system to prevent foreign monarchies and governments from infiltrating the U.S. presidency.

Mr. Obama is a King and not a President because the Title of Nobility provisions in the U.S. Constitution are meant to prevent the offspring of U.S. citizen female mothers and foreign non-U.S. citizen male fathers from being declared natural born Citizens who can become President.

In Mr. Obama’s case, due to his lack of natural born U.S. citizenship, his administration is usurping the U.S. constitution and usurping the rights of natural born U.S. Citizens as a class of citizens.

This is a violation of the Constitution and the rights guaranteed to U.S. natural born Citizens by the definition of natural born Citizen, the Title of Nobility prohibitions in the Constitution, and the First Amendment prohibition against the government and church combining into one, as happens in a monarchy.

Thus the Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ requirement has been definitely shown to not be about the monarchal society definition of being born on the territorial soil, nor about being born to a mother who has been granted a title of nobility, but is in actual fact only about the natural birthright inheritance of natural born citizenship from a U.S. State citizen father.

This is the first case brought against the United States that definitively establishes the meaning of the U.S. Constitution’s Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ requirements for U.S. President.

Mr. Guthrie invites people to visit his website at jedipauly.com and read Guthrie v. United States linked on the front page.